MCP servers for AI bug-bounty agents, compared
This page is for hunters who run an AI agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) on bug-bounty work and want to know which MCP servers are worth connecting. No single server does everything, and most good setups combine three layers: an execution layer that touches the target (Burp), a recon layer that maps it, and an intelligence layer that says what is known, what has paid before, and what is new. vulntel is an intelligence-layer server; this page compares it with the servers you would weigh it against, and says plainly where the others are stronger.
Checked against each project's own pages on 2026-11-03. Projects move fast: if a cell is wrong, tell us and we will fix it.
At a glance
| What it is for | Hosted or local | Cost | Needs your platform token | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vulntel | CVE intelligence + disclosed-report mechanics + program priors + new scope, for agents | hosted (mcp.vulntel.com) |
free; 9 tools keyless (25 calls/day), free key for all 13 | no |
| Vulners MCP | broad CVE / advisory search | hosted + open source | free tier (100 API credits/month) to $1,300/month | no |
| VulnCheck MCP | exploitation intelligence, KEV ahead of CISA | local (Go / Docker) | free Community token covers NVD tools; most indices paid | no |
| h1-brain | your own HackerOne history + 3,600+ disclosed reports, per-program briefings | local | free | yes (HackerOne API token) |
| bbradar (Pro) | scope changes on 24 platforms, target scores, duplicate/competition risk | local MCP (@bbradar/mcp) |
free discovery; Pro paid | no |
| TargetFinder | scope tracking on 6 platforms with re-add events and competition level | local | free (MIT) | no |
| Vulnerability-Exposure-MCP | "am I affected" from banners, distro patch checks, report checking | local | free (MIT) | no |
| cvENGINE | self-hosted attack-surface platform with distro-aware CVE matching | self-hosted | free (GPL-3) | no |
| Burp MCP (PortSwigger) | drive Burp from the agent: requests, proxy history | local, inside Burp | free extension (GPL-3.0); needs Burp | no |
Where each one is stronger
- Vulners has the broadest advisory coverage of the hosted options (230+ sources) and a mature self-serve ladder; its MCP is included on every tier, Free too. If you mainly need "find advisories about X", start there.
- VulnCheck has the strongest exploitation evidence (first-party research, VulnCheck KEV), and its MCP has 29 tools. It runs locally and most indices need a paid plan.
- h1-brain is the closest thing to vulntel's report-driven tools, and it knows your HackerOne history, which no hosted service can. It needs your HackerOne token and runs on your machine.
- bbradar covers far more platforms for scope changes (24) and already filters re-adds and normalization noise, with a duplicate/competition-risk estimate. If fresh scope across many platforms is your main loop, it is ahead. TargetFinder is the free, local alternative.
- Vulnerability-Exposure-MCP and cvENGINE also give distro-aware answers for server banners (Debian / Ubuntu backports), locally or self-hosted, and cvENGINE pairs it with real scanning.
- Burp's MCP is the execution layer. vulntel does not replace it; it tells the agent where to point it.
What vulntel does differently
Only claims we can back:
- Hosted, free, nothing to install, no platform token. One URL, and nine tools answer without a key.
- Mechanics from ~14,000 distilled disclosed HackerOne reports, with a
tried=list. You tellfind_attack_approacheswhich bug classes you have already exhausted and it ranks the nearest approaches you have not tried. Others offer report search or per-program suggestions; we found none that takes a caller's tried list. - Program priors from public disclosures across all hunters.
program_outcome_priorgives, per bug class, how much more often it landed on a program than on average, and which classes almost never land there, without your token. - A per-claim CVE fact-check.
verify_cve_claimsplits a claim into exists / affects this version / severity / exploited and returns supported, refuted or unverifiable for each, with evidence: built for catching an agent's confident mistakes before they reach a report. - Distro verdicts from a verbatim banner, hosted, including Alpine. Paste
OpenSSH_8.9p1 Ubuntu-3ubuntu0.10and each CVE gets Ubuntu's own verdict for that build next to the upstream one. Others now do Debian / Ubuntu locally; hosted with Alpine is the difference. - New scope with the program's history joined.
new_in_scopelists assets that just entered a program's scope (re-adds and renames filtered out) with the program's disclosed-report history, a cached stack if we have one, and advisories for newly added code repositories. bbradar and TargetFinder track more platforms; the joined context is ours.
Where vulntel is weaker: it is HackerOne-centric for report data (Bugcrowd publishes few full disclosures), it has no first-party exploitation telemetry, and it covers fewer bounty platforms for scope than bbradar.
A setup that works
Execution: Burp's MCP. Recon: your own tooling, or observe for a quick stack read. Intelligence: vulntel for
"what is known, what has paid, what is new", plus h1-brain if you want your own HackerOne history in the loop.
Related
- Every vulntel tool, with live examples
- Vulnerability intelligence APIs compared: vulntel vs VulnCheck vs Vulners vs OpenCVE as data APIs
- New in bug bounty scope, weekly
Sources (checked 2026-11-03)
- Vulners pricing and MCP: vulners.com/pricing, docs.vulners.com/docs/products/mcp/
- VulnCheck MCP tools: github.com/vulncheck-oss/mcp (docs/tools.md); indices: docs.vulncheck.com/indices
- h1-brain: github.com/PatrikFehrenbach/h1-brain
- bbradar: github.com/bbradar-io/bbradar.io
- TargetFinder: github.com/NaroChatyan/targetfinder
- Vulnerability-Exposure-MCP: github.com/MRFrazer25/Vulnerability-Exposure-MCP
- cvENGINE: github.com/hevnsnt/CVEngine
- Burp MCP server: github.com/PortSwigger/mcp-server
- vulntel tools: vulntel.com/tools